Flesh out the benchmark post some more

This commit is contained in:
lol3rrr
2026-02-21 18:57:06 +01:00
parent e11bfdc559
commit 6fa9bb8062

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
+++
title = "Ceph Benchmarking"
date = 2026-03-01
date = 2026-02-21
description = "The results of some of my recent ceph benchmarks"
draft = true
@@ -9,6 +9,9 @@ categories = ["Homelab"]
tags = ["Homelab", "Ceph"]
+++
## Motivation
I have been running a ceph cluster in my homelab for about 2 years now, but never properly benchmarked it, let alone wrote down my findings or any potential conclusions.
## Setup everything for the Benchmarking
On a machine in the ceph-cluster already:
1. Generate a minimal ceph config using `ceph config generate-minimal-conf`
@@ -39,33 +42,100 @@ Setup the benchmark itself:
5. `mount /dev/rbd0 /mnt/bench`
## Benchmarks
All benchmarks are run with the same configuration, only changing the access (read/write, random/sequential).
Key configuration options are:
- using libaio
- direct io
- 1 job
{% details(summary="fio config") %}
```
[global]
ioengine=libaio
direct=1
size=4G
numjobs=1
runtime=60s
time_based
startdelay=5s
group_reporting
stonewall
name=write
rw=write
filename=bench
[1io_4k]
iodepth=1
bs=4k
[1io_8k]
iodepth=1
bs=8k
[1io_64k]
iodepth=1
bs=64k
[1io_4M]
iodepth=1
bs=4M
[32io_4k]
iodepth=32
bs=4k
[32io_8k]
iodepth=32
bs=8k
[32io_64k]
iodepth=32
bs=64k
[32io_4M]
iodepth=32
bs=4M
```
{% end %}
## Results
{% details(summary="Random Reads - 1 Job") %}
{% details(summary="Random Reads") %}
{{ fio_benchmark(path="content/ceph-benchmarking/benchmarks/random_read.json") }}
{% end %}
{% details(summary="Random Writes - 1 Job") %}
{% details(summary="Random Writes") %}
{{ fio_benchmark(path="content/ceph-benchmarking/benchmarks/random_write.json") }}
{% end %}
{% details(summary="Sequential Reads - 1 Job") %}
{% details(summary="Sequential Reads") %}
{{ fio_benchmark(path="content/ceph-benchmarking/benchmarks/seq_read.json") }}
{% end %}
{% details(summary="Sequential Writes - 1 Job") %}
{% details(summary="Sequential Writes") %}
{{ fio_benchmark(path="content/ceph-benchmarking/benchmarks/seq_write.json") }}
{% end %}
## TODO
- Try directly on the block device
- Try this using xfs instead of ext4
- Try this with and without drive caches
## Conclusion
1. Overall I am satisfied with the performance of the cluster for my current use-case.
2. There is a lot of room for improvement in the low queue-depth range
3. The network is not really a limiting factor currently
- None of the nodes in the cluster exceeded 500MiB/s of TX or RX, so there is plenty of room for growth
- My client used for testing was limited by the network, evident by the fact that the highest speed achieved is ~1.2GB/s (~10Gb/s)
4. My smallest node (the embedded epyc) could be the limiting factor as in some benchmarks, it reached 100% cpu usage, while my other nodes never exceeded 40%
## Extra Details
{% details(summary="Cluster Hardware") %}
- 10 Gb Networking between all nodes
- Node
- Ryzen 5 5500
- 64GB RAM
- 4x 480GB enterprise SSD
- Node
- Ryzen 5 3600
- 64GB RAM
- 4x 480GB enterprise SSD
- Node
- EPYC 3151
- 64GB RAM
- 4x 480GB enterprise SSD
{% end %}
## Details
{% details(summary="Command to convert raw data into vis data") %}
{% details(summary="Command to convert raw data into data for visualisation") %}
```bash
jq '[.jobs[] | { iodepth: ."job options".iodepth, bs: ."job options".bs, operations: { iops: .write.iops, bw_bytes: .write.bw_bytes } }]' content/ceph-benchmarking/benchmarks/raw_random_write.json | jq '
@@ -96,3 +166,8 @@ jq '[.jobs[] | { iodepth: ."job options".iodepth, bs: ."job options".bs, operati
'
```
{% end %}
## Future Work
- Try directly on the block device
- Try this using xfs instead of ext4
- Try this with and without drive caches